Boat bribery payments and motives behind

The Amnesty International report on 28 October 2015 gave us details about how Australian officials made payments to the Indonesian smuggling crew on two occasions (Download AI report here --> http://www.netipr.org/saorg/docs/20151028_australia-abuse-asylum-seekers-at-sea-by-ai.pdf) . The first occasion on May 2015, the boat with 65 Sri Linkan nationals were onboard had been traveling to New Zealand. On the second instance on late June 2015, the boat was with onboard two dozen passengers from Bangladesh and Burma. The Indonesian authorities had made public about the Australian bribery payments for the first occasion, including evidences of the money being paid. For the second occasion, the Indonesian authorities keep the case close to their chest, but we can be certain that all evidences were carefully examined and kept for future references. In any case, we -- the observers -- now have all political information about the Australian officials' bribery payments to the people smugglers.

There are two things still baffling for me though. First, why Australian Government considered it is 'necessary' to pay those Indonesian crews ? We have to ponder this question because the Operation Sovereign Borders had been in action since 2013 and there were previous instances of turning back boats without ever paying to the crews.

The second puzzle is from the timeline of May 2015 incident. That well equipped boat had departed on 5th May 2015 from Pelabuhan Ratu of Indonesia and traveling towards New Zealand on international waters. The Australian officials made their first contact with this boat on 17th May 2015. Why wait this long, if they know this was a smugglers boat which were to be intervened ? Then only on 22nd May 2015, the Australian officials had taken control of the boat, took it to the Greenhill Island of Australia. There, the alleged payment to the crew was made and send the passengers and crew back to Roti Island of Indonesia on the 29th May 2015. Question: what did it tell us about from these interceptions ? What the Australian Government were thinking all that time ? That is quite a mystery.

In any case, the Australian Senate hearing on the bribery payments will be again on this Friday 5th February 2015. I look forward to hear more about these. -- In Solidarity, U Ne Oo, Sydney.

http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and...

LATEST UPDATE

Common law aspects of the doctor-patient contractual relationship in connection with the patient's natural (inalienable) rights in medical treatment. Examine Commonwealth Government's healthcare provision in offshore immigration detention based on the common law doctor-patient contract. Open public license 4.0 applied all content.

FEATURED

Collection of evidence and cases on detention slavery. Have chosen pieces of evidence that are reliable so that one can submit directly to the tribunal of fact. All evidence is taken from verifiable sources only. Two examples of enslavement with medevac delays on Faysal Ishak Ahmed and Samuel. Open public license 4.0 applied all content.

FEATURED

Australia's offshore processing scheme is interpreted within the context of enslavement of asylum-seekers. Starts with the applicability of Australian slavery laws at offshore settings, compare international and domestic slavery laws. Then, identify offshore medevac delay incidents as the indicators for slavery. Elucidate such delay incidents as violation of natural rights of human person, and that of Torture Laws and Slavery Laws.