Slavery

IN-REPLY>> This is not a 'fake news'. It is statement of my personal observation of the Government of Australia commissioning of enslavement crime since 2014. Detail report here. http://www.aus4iccwitness.org/node/48

IN-REPLY>> My dear Marj Meers. The thing I am talking here is about "crime & justice". The LNP Government had enslaved these asylum-seekers -- which you said are not good people -- for 4.5 years. The government had colluded in making money for the detention companies, such as Broadspectrum (entirely Australian owned by the way). The Government committing of this enslavement crime has been proven. By Law, the government or any organisation or any person "MUST NOT ENSLAVE" any other "HUMAN BEING", whether that "HUMAN BEING" is good or bad persons. HYPOTHETICALLY: let's me put a parable in this way. Say (LET SAY), Australia had some "convicted criminals" placed in Nauru for detention. Lets say, the detention company had asked the government to extend these criminals' sentence so that the company would make more money. Would that be fair thing to do? Would that be allowed ? I would say that will be a case of "slavery (enslavement)". Here now, these asylum-seekers, "HUMAN BEINGS" by the way, are convicted of no crimes; our government has been detaining them year after year and the detention companies are making billions after billions for every year. Why not the government resolving these detention cases sooner, or just send to New Zealand for example. Just think about it. Justice must be served by all. Cheers.

>>IN-REPLY:>> My dear Russell Follett. About 80% of those on Manus & Nauru are 'recognized' refugees. Within them, a numbers of those are 'stateless persons'. Refugee, by definition, cannot be forced or practically unable to return to their country. For stateless persons, return to their countries isn't even 'theoretically' possible. Look at the cases of Salim Kyaw Ning and Feriboz Kirimi, who both died last year on Manus Island and Nauru. They are stateless people from Myanmar and Iran. The statement of these people cannot be 'returned back to their own country' is "real". And the statement of our government enslaving them is not a "political rhetoric". The crime of enslavement is "real" and perpetrators must face justice. Cheers. NetIPR. http://www.aus4iccwitness.org/node/57

IN-REPLY:>> What I am telling is Australian government, or anybody else, has 'no rights' to exploit any other human being as "slave". Whether that "enslaved" person is a "crook" or "criminal" or "illegal queue jumpers" or "prostitutes of bad characters" or "suffering from leprosy or HIV/AIDS" or "crippled and disabled". It is "irrelevant" point to it now, whether these "people" are refugees or non-refugees, nobody has the "right" to exploit another human beings in this way. When our government deprive the asylum-seekers personal liberties, whilst making ways for detention companies to make billions of money, that become the act of crime: CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY. You might like to have a look at the High Court Case of "Queen vs. Tang", where a brothel owner in Melbourne had 'exploited" the 'alien prostitute/sex-workers" as "slaves" in few years back. What we are seeing, in comparison with our government action now, is the kind of "exploitation" of "legally defenseless" and "vulnerable" human being as "slaves". Cheers. NetIPR.