The scandal at hand

Nowadays, the Liberal Government in Australia is touting itself on the "success" of its "Cambodian Resettlement Deals", which sees half-dozen asylum seekers in Nauru had opted for that alternative. The mainstream press, of course, has been floating astonishingly high cost for that resettlement deals -- 40 to 55 Millions AUD -- if the Australian public were to believe.


Standing up for Refugees ? Set up a FB Group and Becomes Human Rights Information Retailer:

My dear friends: In these days of a very sophisticated and well-featured free networks like Facebook, there are more than one way to help the causes for refugees. You can actually start your own "Group" to share and exchange information. All you need is few hours of your time in the evening, just to moderate the postings. Already there are handy ways and examples for setting up guidelines on an information forum you are about to administer.

The Internet and Grassroots Activism


The myths, secrecies and refugee policy

An activist colleagues pointed out about the odds that are facing by refugee rights movement in Australia. Note the point he made, "MPs are not going to lose their seats over asylum-seeker issues", which probably is true. To my observation, the support for refugees isn't defined along partisan line, i.e. neither Labor nor Liberal specific thing. So too on the curtailing of the rights of refugees -- a certain section of population from both sides of politics think that is a good idea.

Electorally Unimportant ?


Pacific Solution for Justice

With regards to Australian Government's bribery payments to smugglers (boat crew), two simple questions are (1) who made the decision to pay that money and (2) who signed onto the cheque. We know that $32,000 USD doesn't come out of DIBP officials' private bank accounts. Nor it was being paid because of the DIBP officials took a pity on the Indonesian smuggling crew.


Honesty is the best policy on payments to smugglers

The Australian Government's continued silence on the payments to smugglers (crew members) may be putting those DIBP officials (civil servants) at risk of being persecuted under the Indonesian Laws. On this case, we should look at the Sub. 8 from Univ.of QLD, projecting two possible scenarios:

(i) Australia acknowledges 'the payment had occurred' and 'asserts it to be the conduct of an organ of Australia' under international law;
(ii) Australia refuses to do so.


Boat turnback bribery and predictable silence

Last Friday's (5/2/16) Senate Inquiry on DIBP and Bribery event seems to be covered only by The Guardian, which is an international publication, and a 'Left wing' the publication which it is often been charged! Predictably, the mass media within Australia had been silent on this subject. Even the national broadcasters like ABC & SBS were silent on this boat turnback bribery incident.


Details on Fazel Chgeni case:

The Radio National broadcasts, 31-1-2016. Correct me if I am wrong -- Fazel Chegeni has never been granted a proper protection visa (refugee status). He was briefly released into community on some type of bridging visa (i.e. there can be many forms of such visa, the Safe Heaven visa, one amongst). All he has been given by DIBP was the notice that he has a strong case to become a refugee in Australia. The fact that he was a stateless Kurdish man from Iran, this is not surprising.


Boat bribery payments and motives behind

The Amnesty International report on 28 October 2015 gave us details about how Australian officials made payments to the Indonesian smuggling crew on two occasions (Download AI report here --> . The first occasion on May 2015, the boat with 65 Sri Linkan nationals were onboard had been traveling to New Zealand.



Subscribe to Communications RSS